Originally Posted by saddlebum;......PAH......306649

Early in the "summit" today, BHO rudely rebuked John McCain saying that he didn't want to hear "talking points" and that the presidential campaign was over, when McCain brought up democrat special deals with pharmaseutical companies, the "Louisiana Purchase", the "Cornhusker kickback" , the Florida medicare advantage situation and others..................that pretty much set the tone for the day.
Democrats THEN proceeded to dwell on their own "talking

Originally Posted by saddlebum;..... PAH.....306421

Mullah Abdul Ghani Banador, the day to day operations chief of the Taliban, #2 man behind Mullah Mohammad Omar, has been captured by the CIA and Pakistani forces.
He may have specific knowledge of Bin Ladin's and Omar's whereabouts and other crucial information.

It would probably be un-American and un-Christian to introduce him to sleep deprivation, loud rap music, implied threats of physical violence......and, oh hell!, don't even consider water-boarding.

This

Originally Posted by saddlebum;[B

PAH....[/b]306235]Did I completely misunderstand BHO speaking to the democrats two days ago when he suggested we shouldn't watch cable news programs ?

He mentioned CNN, FOX and kinda threw MSNBC in to appear "fair and balanced".
Including MSNBC was laughable because they've been "pimpin'" for BHO since the primaries.
CNN wasn't the object of this silly, immature, super-sensitive statement either, he's still upset with FOX because they ask relevant questions

Originally Posted by saddlebum;PAH...306037

As of 1/29/10, BHO and Attorney General Eric Holder, have given up on their misguided attempt to have the 9/11 Islamic terrorists trials in New York City after most of the state congressmen, bipartisan national congressmen, mayors, govenors, ordinary citizens, the "naked cowboy", hotdog vendors and other business people brought to their attention the enormous costs of security and loss of business to Lower Manhatten.

The OBSCURE fact that a bipartisan group of congressmen

Originally Posted by saddlebum;PAH...306015

Apparently BHO and his speech writers didn't have enough time to research the REVISED speech after republican Scott Brown's victory in the Massachusetts senate race.
BHO's rude and unbelievably 'in your face' assertion that foriegn entities would be able to influence our elections because of the Supreme Court's ruling was absolutely wrong.
These justices researched this possibility, and even though Justice Stevens mentioned this in his dissenting opinion, the vast majority of legal experts